• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Look up the story of 17th-century castaway Phillip Quarll.
    After several years alone on an island in the Pacific, although it had an abundant monkey population. Then one day a ship passed by and landed on the shore.

    Quarll opted to remain alone on the island for the rest of his days, assured the captain that he was of sound mind even while choosing such a fate, to prove it handed him his own story in writing, I suppose there was paper and ink that had survived the shipwreck.

    Quarll cooked a meal for the captain, using only ingredients he had been using for years on the island; the captain later described the meal as exquisite in its’ simplicity and harmony, at one with nature.

    In his experiences, Quarll had been changed profoundly. Originally quite a drunk hellraiser back in England, he had found an inner peace, and did not see the value of himself returning to civilization and society.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        Some exceptions: Panda bears and koala bears and teddy bears and Gary the big, hairy, gay vegan.

        • palordrolap
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          “Panda bears” annoys me because they weren’t classified as bears for a while and my brain is stuck on that. However without the “bears”, “panda(s)” needs to be preceded by “giant” in order to distinguish from red pandas, which are not bears.

          “Koala bears”, however is 100% wrong. They’re just koalas. They look like teddy bears though, which explains the confusion.

          And finally, teddy bears. What would we call them if former US president Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt hadn’t been associated with them? Would they be as popular as they are?

          “Toy bears” sounds reasonable until you realise that a “toy poodle” is a flesh-and-blood abomination creature.

          What’s the deal with nightgowns called teddies being named after a man called Theodore Bear? That’s not a joke. How did this happen?

          And why the f–k is Gary wearing one?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        WHAAA— I thought they just ate honey and, I dunno, graham crackers or something. I’ll never look at those cute lil teddy bears the same.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    08 months ago

    We also suffered untill amounts Of illnesses and pain due to a variety of diseases and parasites, one will die within two years due to a paper cut that got infected, the other will die from hunger long before that.

    But other than that its great!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          You’d rather be a living slave than die free? That’s certainly a choice… not the right choice, but one nevertheless.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                A capitalist is one who lives off their capital. I doubt you’ll find many of them on Lemmy or anywhere really, as their numbers are extremely low compared to the working rest of humanity.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                08 months ago

                Oh, jeez, I forgot that page in the Communist Manifesto where Carlos Marcos said: “SOCIALISM IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH MODERN MEDICINE. COMMUNISM IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH CIVILIZATION.”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                This just in: capitalism is the only system in which people don’t die of preventable disease

                More “seriously, what the fuck is this argument” whenever this genius replies

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  08 months ago

                  How did your country’s education fail you this badly? You have the reading comprehension of a recently alphabetized child.

    • The Menemen!
      link
      fedilink
      08 months ago

      While this is very much possible, there defintly are also accounts of people living in wildness for decades. Just look up “Japanese holdout”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        Yeah it’s possible to live in the wild, because that’s how people lived for a million years. Just there’s a significant probability you won’t.

  • Rob T Firefly
    link
    fedilink
    English
    08 months ago

    It’s appropriate that this post comes from the site sh.itjust.works.

    • insomniac_lemon
      link
      fedilink
      08 months ago

      Dang, that’s crazy. Wait, no, that could definitely happen today in the US. Even if cost is not an issue, I could see many people waiting it out or delaying action (until it ruptures) for various reasons especially if they have no idea what the pain could be.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      08 months ago

      I’d rather have that over sitting in traffic driving to a soul devouring corporate job due to RTO

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        As if you would have a sound sleep and full belly every day stuck on an island for your very short existence.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Did you miss the part about dying of appendicitis? It was literally one sentence.

            If your thesis is “I would rather be dead than RTO and have my soul devoured,” well, I have some sympathy for that point of view. But what you actually said is “One is living,” and actually no, one is very much not living.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              08 months ago

              Right. And I would trade that existence, with the prior 2 years of living, for the other scenario that I mentioned.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                Why the fuck are you on Lemmy then? Go build a canoe, try to row to a deserted island, then sink and die in a storm. Live free, friend!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                08 months ago

                There are islands out there. If you truly think you would prefer that life you can just… go do it.

                You don’t even need an island. You could wander off into the jungle of Vietnam and never hear from society again.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  08 months ago

                  Ha…actually, we already are. we retired last year and are moving to a very rural location in another country this year.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  08 months ago

                  sure, people fantasize about this and the few people who actually do it realize that they do need some modern infrastructure for bare minimum survival. It’s really difficult to live off the land in the middle of nowhere in a hostile jungle. we have spent centuries progressing to modern civilization and yes we have gone too far, but we do need some modern amenities to ensure basic comfort and basic needs are met.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        I think this would have gone quite differently in the Tropics, since I expect Antarctica to have quite a few less bacteria that could have infected the wound. Still hardcore, though.

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        That’s Dr. Leonid Ivanovich Rogozov, but to be fair he did get his MD 5 years after that antarctic expedition.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      08 months ago

      Sure but considering help hadn’t arrived in 2 years, I don’t think another 2 weeks with a working beacon would’ve changed anything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      People missing the fact this comic is using humor and hyperbole to make a point about the things that make us miserable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        Or maybe people make themselves miserable because they don’t realize that there’s nothing really stopping them from doing all the things listed in the comic could be done in the comfort of their home.

        Well I suppose to do hunting you’d have to leave your house, but I think it’s something that’s far more enjoyable if you don’t have to worry about starving if you fail.

        The real joke is people so far removed from nature they don’t have a concept of how harsh it is,

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think the idea is that their life on this island is more enjoyable than their previous life. So they decide they want to stay there after all. Which honestly is understandable on an emotional level sometimes but realistically they would be dead after a few weeks from unclean water, wildlife, infection, illness, etc

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        Yeah, I get wanting to unplug and get away, but the first serious illness or injury will have them wishing they still had a way to call for help.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          I don’t think that the beacon works that way. The way I interpreted the comic the beacon has been active for the two years and still no help arrived.

          Destroying it doesn’t really change anything, most likely it wasn’t working anyhow because otherwise you aren’t stranded for two years. It might just make it easier to accept rescue isn’t coming. And doing it voluntary because you prefer the lifestyle could be good moral boost.

          But yes, if you are voluntary on an island you want means to contact help. What Masafumi Nagasaki did sounds pretty sweet sometimes. Living naked and alone on an island just getting groceries every few weeks for 30 years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          Even beyond that, I think this sentiment is easy to get into from the comfort of climate controlled, weatherproof structures, with abundant food that doesn’t require months of forethought and planning to farm or energy expenditure to hunt or gather. I’d love to chuck up materialism and peer pressure, but I’m firmly attached to the various infrastructures that make my life so comfortable.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              08 months ago

              When my mom had to poop as a kid, she had to stand on two planks of wood and squat over a hole in the ground, out in the open. I love my toilet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        I mean if they’ve been there for two years I’m sure that means they’ve learned how to purify water at least to a drinkable state, but also, has the rescue beacon even been working.

        I bet the dude never actually turned it on and has just pretended he did, playing the long game to get the lady to wanna spend time with him.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          Or the comic was made by an incredibly sheltered individual who would get reality checked in a day in a survival situation.

          Like that lady who killed herself, her sister, and her son because she thought you could just head into the woods and start banging rocks together or something.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          08 months ago

          …why does it have to be a predatory horror thriller? The comic has not even steered in the neighborhood of this

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            08 months ago

            the faceless expression and monotonous repetitive response… they’re practically catatonic from all the distress and parasites

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      08 months ago

      You didn’t miss anything, it’s a terrible comic. It’s just saying the castaway wants to stay and the woman says yup 3 times in a row. The beacon is unexplained and makes no difference. There’s no point, no punch line, no depth, no dimension. It’s a small sentence about leaving material trappings that didn’t even need 3 panels, an island or a companion.

      He says a thing, she’s say yup 3 times, they’re on an island…