• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 day ago

      18 U.S. Code § 333 - Mutilation of national bank obligations

      I guess there’s some wiggle room with regards to intent and whether it could be argued that adding Nazi iconography (moreso than trump’s face as-is) to bills renders them unfit to be kept in circulation.

      If my personal freedom was on the line here, I’m sticking with “idk it was like that when I got it - can I get a new one please?” vs “ooh come on, it’s fiiine, you can still spend this!” but interpreting the law isn’t my specialty, so grain of salt.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 day ago

        We’re a long way from “super duper illegal” now aren’t we? Intent is everything. If you’re not attempting fraud nobody will care.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 day ago

          Then do the thing? Is super duper illegal different from regular illegal? Why are we bashing heads over the use of ‘super duper’ in NotTheOnion in the first place?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Why are you wrapping random words with quotation marks? It reads like it’s being spoken aloud by Dr. Evil. Anyway, gonna go with the wording of the law itself over a wiki article about it:

              18 U.S. Code § 331 - Mutilation, diminution, and falsification of coins

              This one’s specific to coins. Anecdotally I was always told they were legal because pennies are explicitly an exception to that law. So, it’s either that or it’s in j-walking territory where it may be illegal, but no one gives a shit enough to enforce it.

              …also coins aren’t really relevant here anyway - the conversation is about defacing paper bills if they decide to soil them with Trump’s traitorous image.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 day ago

                the conversation is about defacing paper bills if they decide to soil them with Trump’s traitorous image.

                Which is not at all illegal by any standard you’ve provided yet.