• ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “We have done this in the past for quarantined communities and found that it did help to reduce exposure to bad content, so we are experimenting with this sitewide,” according to the main post. Reddit “may consider” expanding the warnings in the future to cover repeated upvotes of other kinds of actions as well as taking other types of actions in addition to warnings.

    Thoughtcrime time.

    Bigger picture - what if Xitter, Meta and Reddit (all run by Trump humpers) started centrally compiling this kind of thing to flag up “persons of interest”?

  • Séän
    link
    fedilink
    12 days ago

    The only subreddit I’ve been visiting is LeopardsAteMyFace and I got a warning. How is it inciting violence if it’s ALREADY happened?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23 days ago

    I mean when everyone else is jettisoning moderation, reddit is cracking down on bots and trolls? I don’t hate it.

    • skmn
      link
      fedilink
      223 days ago

      Sure, but isn’t Reddit the one who gets to choose what counts as bannable?

    • kat
      link
      fedilink
      83 days ago

      I mean they’re deciding based on what falls as violent on whatever arbitrary classifiers they’re feeling that day.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -103 days ago

    Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if this started happening at Lemmy too. Its a lot easier to control what kind of content is on a platform when you do something like this.

    Now, I don’t particularly think this is a good idea, but I can see the benefit of this as well. People have the freedom to upvote whatever they choose, even if I think they are dumb for doing it, and they shouldn’t have to worry about anyone other than law enforcement or lawyers (in extreme edge cases) using that information against them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      63 days ago

      One thing I like about lemmy is you can still upvote ‘removed by moderator’ comments and I always do because it’s funny

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      103 days ago

      Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if this started happening at Lemmy too. Its a lot easier to control what kind of content is on a platform when you do something like this.

      This wouldn’t even be possible on Lemmy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 days ago

        Right now maybe, but Lemmy is open source, and anyone could fork it to add this functionality.

        • HeyLow 🏳️‍⚧️
          link
          fedilink
          113 days ago

          Yeah only per instance though, upvotes and downvotes are already public information so it wouldn’t take much for an instance admin to implement

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 days ago

          If lemmy did this you’d see forks ripping this out, not to mention anything other than lemmy would not have it, so only a very small subset of the fediverse would be subject to this at all, making it perfectly useless

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝
      link
      fedilink
      33 days ago

      Honestly I wouldn’t be surprised if this started happening at Lemmy too.

      You missed the Vegan Cat Food Wars then.