• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    361 day ago

    wow he really said this?

    “Participants in the system,” he said, derive benefit from high health care costs. While lower prices and improved services can be good for consumers and patients, Witty said, they can “threaten revenue streams for organizations that depend on charging more for care.”

    Yes this basic human right could be cheap or even free, but then how would shareholders make more money exploiting it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      724 hours ago

      Bro literally said,that they don’t care about anything but profits and are willing to kill people for this.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      1024 hours ago

      He’s also just straight up lying. I’m a participant in the system with chronic health issues. I would have benefited more from never going to see a doctor and kept my family out of debt than what I ended up doing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    671 day ago

    While lower prices and improved services can be good for consumers and patients, Witty said, they can “threaten revenue streams for organizations that depend on charging more for care.”

    are they a health insurance or a revenue stream insurance?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      are they a health insurance or a revenue stream insurance?

      Come now, I think we already have that answer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        322 hours ago

        In other words, productivity gains increase poverty. Congratulations on owning your most powerful smart phone yet, but now a bean and rice burrito from a fast food place is over 6 USD.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 day ago

      You have your answer under capitalism. Unfortunately good healthcare and late capitalism seem to not be too compatible.

    • Larry13
      link
      fedilink
      523 hours ago

      That has to be one of the most tone deaf and evil (the banal greedy kind) of things I’ve ever heard.

      While law enforcement can be good for citizens and society, Capone said, they can “threaten revenue streams for organizations that depend on doing crime.”

      Same vibe right?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      842 days ago

      Not really, he’s doubling down:

      “Many of you knew Brian … he devoted his time to help make the health system work better for all of the people we’re privileged to serve.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 day ago

          So it’s a true statement in the sense that they made the healthcare system better at extracting profit from their costumers to serve the shareholders. Death and suffering is just a method. Andrew Witty, what a soulless shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          332 days ago

          “The insurance companies are the good guys, fighting against outrageous hospital charges, doctors fraudulently demanding excessive tests and care, and odious government regulations.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        262 days ago

        for all of the people we’re privileged to serve

        This is Corporate America slight of hand, they think the people they serve are the shareholders, not their customers. Their customers are an operating cost to them and they’ll do what they can to keep that cost down so they can maximize their profits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1282 days ago

    “The system needs to function better,” says the figurehead of a completely unnecessary middleman.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    421 day ago

    “We only do reprehensible things because we’re allowed to. We would totally be ethical if forced to!”

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    1112 days ago

    Cool. Shut down your company and tell everyone else in your network to do the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 day ago

        There is actually a shred of truth in that.

        The insurance company is supposed to watch dog and make sure that the doctor’s office is doing the right thing.

        Since the average patient doesn’t know what the hell the doctor’s supposed to be doing anyway, capitalism makes for some pretty shitty health practices. Like the $60 tylenols.

        To eliminate private insurance you also need to create oversight and limits on the healthcare side of things too.

        I worked in IT in health insurance years ago, those mom and pop doctor’s offices would submit the same bill six or seven times back to back. Our system at the time had no ability to de-doop so they just kept getting payday after payday until we caught on.

        Not all health care providers are good people either.

        • Lemminary
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          Would patients fall that much into debt if regular doctors were setting the prices, though? The invoices are quite outrageous across the board in the US as it is. After all, the blame lies on the MBAs who are the experts at juicing the system and not the MDs who inevitably get dragged into. I’d argue the great majority of MDs actually sympathize with patients since they are the ones who signed up to help people in the first place and I’ve befriended a handful of them who I can point to as examples.

          At least where I live, this balance is somewhat managed by the competition between the public vs private sectors. If the public one is failing you, you can always opt for a private one or vice-versa. I’ve done both and each has its benefits and shortcomings. But, mind you, this is a system without insurance at its core as a consequence of the universal care that we have.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            324 hours ago

            The problem is that the whole health care can’t be run by the doctors. You need the might of a corporation or a government with a tax stream income to be able to afford the equipment. Well outfitted hospitals are mind-bogglingly expensive. So the problem becomes how to not attach the greed to the healthcare, But still process the billions of dollars required to set up and maintain institutions.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          224 hours ago

          The insurance company is supposed to watch dog and make sure that the doctor’s office is doing the right thing.

          I’m trying to think of the name of something we could call an alternative option to that… maybe something like The Blederal Blovernment.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            223 hours ago

            Absolutely, many governments in many countries do an absolutely adequate job at managing healthcare soup to nuts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    351 day ago

    They say this because…

    … anyone?

    That’s right, Timmy, it’s because they want to execute a large merger once Trump is in power.

    • paraphrand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “We’ll be able to improve efficiency, reduce duplicative effort and increase profits.”

      “And lower rates?”

      “What?”

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    46
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Agreed. Ask the government to take you and the other big insurers over, and fire your overhead asses.

  • JaggedRobotPubes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 day ago

    “Somebody involved in it, perhaps towards the top, should do something about that”, he continued.

    • d00phy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 day ago

      “I mean, not me. I only just got this job. Still finding my way. But someone should definitely do something. Gonna be a lot of work figuring out what should be done. It’s just so complicated. We’re going to have to invent some way to make sure everyone can access competent and affordable healthcare. How do you do that? Where do you even start? What a monumental task. But think of the accomplishment if we could do that. Think of the example we’d be setting for so many other nations. We’d be pretty great. I mean we already are pretty great, but we’d be better. Man, we’d be awesome.” At this point he’s gone, like a poor person dreaming about what they’d do if they won the lottery.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Luigi Mangione did more for the American health care system than any health insurance CEO. Just to clarify, killing a man is deplorable but the fact that his actions sparked these debates and brought them to everyone’s attention should make everyone aware of what his actions caused.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness
      link
      fedilink
      242 days ago

      killing a man is deplorable

      Killing a cold blooded murderer is… well, even if you don’t believe it’s justice it’s definitely not something to cry about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 day ago

        I’ve seen arguments for it being self defense, especially if you have united insurance.

        They’ve “legally” killed thousands of people through paperwork.

        Not to mention CEO has to be the most replaceable job ever. It’s the one job I’m 100% chatgpt could do better, and save these companies millions every year.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 day ago

          The problem with that is you can’t easily sCapEgOat ChatGPT. No one would feel satisfied when they tell us “because of the company image after this recent scandal, CEO GPT will be replaced with CEO Copilot.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            123 hours ago

            This is such a good point. That’s always the story. Company does something horrific - almost certainly at the behest of investors. People call them out for it, CEO gets “fired”, company takes no accountability, and they place another CEO that will tow the investor’s line.

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 days ago

    Here’s an idea. Take out the pieces that inflate costs, provide no actual healthcare, and make ridiculous profits.