The original post: /r/ufos by /u/Special_Agent_6304 on 2024-12-29 20:18:34.
I very strongly challenge the status quo (100%). Experts who dismiss UAP evidence, such as the Pentagon videos or sightings witnessed by multiple credible individuals, are not only misleading the public—they are actively undermining science and public.
Dismissal of Pentagon UAP Videos
The Pentagon’s UAP footage shows objects performing maneuvers that defy clearly defy principles of aerodynamics. To dismiss these as “balloons” or “human crafts” is intellectually dishonest. Ignoring this is not skepticism—it’s negligence of evidence.
Ignoring Mass Witness Testimonies as “Mass Hallucination”
Theories that dismiss multiple corroborated sightings by massive number of witnesses as “mass hallucination” are absurd. It’s insulting and unscientific to brush off their experiences without proper investigation.
Whistleblowers and Veterans Deserve Respect
Many whistleblowers and military veterans have come forward with information about UAPs, often at great personal risk. To label these individuals as “crazy” is a disgrace. These are people who have dedicated their lives to serving their country, and their testimonies should be treated with respect and investigated seriously. Being dismissed by some foolish experts who don’t know how investigation, intelligence, law enforcement.
Misuse of the Scientific Method
Many experts hide behind the excuse that “science can’t verify these claims.” But science is only one tool—it excels in studying physical materials and interactions.
Claims about UAPs often require detective like work and intelligence analysis (not scientific method), which are outside the realm of traditional scientific methods. Experts who dismiss this work because it’s not strictly “scientific” are showing their ignorance of how interdisciplinary problems are solved.
If these so-called experts were placed in intelligence agencies, they’d fail spectacularly. By dismissing all visuals, video evidence, and radar data on targets, they’d undermine national security and fail to neutralize the targets. The intelligence community relies on some evidence, analysis, creativity to connect the dots, something these scientists are clearly not equipped to handle.
Civilian Contributions of Imagery just by using google maps to solves cases for law enforcement
There have been real cases where civilians using tools like Google Maps and open-source video analysis have solved mysteries and caught criminals. For instance, in this video, civilians analyzed Google Maps imagery and interlinked it with video footage to identify a suspect—a brilliant example of how detective methods work.
In a hypothetical situation, if scientists with these dismissive attitudes were in the place of these civilians, they would have likely misled law enforcement and intelligence agencies by disregarding the evidence entirely. Their rigid skepticism and refusal to entertain unconventional methods would have derailed investigations, causing missed opportunities to identify high-value targets or solve critical cases. This highlights how detrimental their approach can be in practical, real-world scenarios.
Also check out this great analysis of New Jersey Drone (UAP) by civilian https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1hogssc/recent_nj_drone_footage_ocean_city_122624_as/, this is only one such example there are many others.
If They Can’t Handle the Truth, They Don’t Deserve Their Titles By Misleading Public:
It’s time to hold these so-called experts accountable. By dismissing UAP footage without proper investigation, they are failing their profession and misleading the public. If they are unwilling to question their assumptions and explore the evidence, they don’t deserve to call themselves scientists. Their PhDs and prestigious titles should go to people who are genuinely committed to uncovering the truth.
A Personal Note
I’ve experienced firsthand how dismissive attitudes in the scientific community and even got called by them as “crazy”. I no longer have faith in any traditional scientific establishments and I hate them the most.
If these so-called experts cannot handle the truth, they have no place in the conversation—and they certainly don’t deserve their titles.