With the discussion of whether assisted dying should be allowed in Scotland befing brought up again, I was wondering what other people thought of the topic.

Do you think people should be allowed to choose when to end their own life?

What laws need to be put into place to prevent abuses in the system?

How do we account for people changing their mind or mental decline causing people to no longer be able to consent to a procedure they previously requested?

  • Remy Rose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    09 months ago

    I was in favor of this until I started reading Marta Russel. She lays out the history of using the concept of assisted dying to do things like get rid of people with disabilities, increase profits for hospitals, decrease funding for home nurses, convince people who are no longer productive that they shouldn’t live anymore, etc etc. It seems like a good idea on paper, because bodily autonomy and stuff, but capitalist ghouls coerce people into it.

    • magnetosphere
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      Anything can be corrupted by capitalist ghouls. I wouldn’t let that fear stop me from doing the right thing. People shouldn’t be forced to suffer, and should be allowed to choose when to die.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        Anything can be corrupted by capitalist ghouls.
        People shouldn’t be forced to suffer

        Can you really not see that capitalist “ghouls” (they’re just people) have already corrupted society enough, that they are the very reason people are suffering in the first place, and that making those who are suffering kill themselves off the “reasonable” solution, instead of ending the suffering enforced on them by capitalists, is very actively playing along with said capitalists, rather than the ones whose suffering you claim to be concerned with?

        • WookieMonster
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 months ago

          Cause nobody ever died of slowly and painfully of cancer except that capitalist forced it on them? Come on. Capitalism sucks a lot, but it’s not the source of ALL problems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      09 months ago

      In Oregon, you have to be able to administer it to yourself. It’s not something someone else does to you.

      Some people get it as an insurance policy of sorts. So it’s an option during end of life care, but not necessarily one they take.

      I am curious about what happens with the med if left unused. Like, do people tuck it away like spare antibiotic eye drops?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        It’s done with a medico in attendance, who then takes the apparatus and spare media on leaving.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      09 months ago

      Guess everyone should suffer because there is the possibility of abuse that we already know about and could take steps to avoid.

    • Hjalmar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      09 months ago

      May I ask were you live? I live in Sweden and would personally trust our medical system not to abuse such tools but depending on were you are I do understand that you might be worried.

      Anyways I don’t really see it as a problem with assisted death but with the system using it