• DdCno1
        link
        fedilink
        117 months ago

        The type of capitalism found in China is known as state capitalism and it’s an unholy blend of central planning and free markets, with the government owning significant stakes in all key industries, exerting a massive control over both the economy and society as a whole using all of the methods used by previous Communist autocracies, only this time with far more technology.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The only way in which communism is inherently authoritarian is in that wealth must be forcibly taken from capitalists and landowners in order to help the masses.

          Equating communism with authoritarianism, but not doing the same with capitalism, a system in which the owning class oppresses (to the point of homelessness and starvation) the working class, is simply ignorant.

          There is oppression under this system as well, there are private prisons that lead directly to incarceration, there is gross inequality, there is global injustice (forced extraction of wealth and natural resources from foreign lands), there is climate injustice in which a tiny minority of the population is directly causing harm, suffering, and an increasing amount of climate refugees (to which they deny entry after making their homes unlivable).

          but yes an economic system that puts the needs of the many above the lavish lifestyles of the few and which prefers cooperation to competition is inherently authoritarian and this one isn’t. How many terrible capitalist countries can you name?

          Capitalism only works in theory.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -47 months ago

            The only way in which communism is inherently authoritarian is in that wealth must be forcibly taken from capitalists and landowners in order to help the masses.

            When wealth was taken from capitalists and landowners in the Soviet Union, it results in millions of poor people starving to death. (the rich people were worked to death; the poor people starved to death; there was a lot of death)

            And yes, that is a very significant way of being authoritarian. Taking people’s property to redistribute is about as authoritarian as it gets.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              Yes the God given law of capitalism dictates the only fair way that wealth can be distributed

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          China is known as state capitalism and it’s an unholy blend of central planning and free markets

          with the government owning significant stakes in all key industries, exerting a massive control over both the economy and society as a whole

          I’m not a very bright person most the time and when an economy is being discussed that multiplies. But how is that a free market by any definition? Or am I completely misunderstanding what you’re saying?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        Literally what half the comments here are saying lmao, like yes and the sky is green everyone knows this

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          07 months ago

          Capitalism only works in theory in practice it’s all homeless encampments, people going hungry, wealth inequality, gender inequality, race inequality, global inequality, climate disaster, war.

          Capitalism has never worked

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            A balance between capitalism and socialism is what most countries are already using and has worked for a long time.

            Communism is the one that only works in theory and anywhere it has been tried has quickly led to dictatorships or else it has fallen apart.

            Edit: what most countries are using (not every country)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              37 months ago

              Social programs and social welfare aren’t really balancing socialism with capitalism, the means of production is fully owned by capitalists and there is no democratization of it. Sure we have some coops but the vast majority of workplaces are dictatorships

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                27 months ago

                It’s more of a balance between how much is run by companies vs the regulations that the government imposes on those companies.

                Pure capitalism doesn’t really exist anywhere.

                And what kind of companies are you working for where you feel that your workplace is a dictatorship? If I ever felt that way I would leave and work somewhere else.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  27 months ago

                  Some Lords probably treat their subjects better than others true, at least we moved past serfdom.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -17 months ago

                Yes workplaces are communist dictatorships. There’s one key difference between a workplace that is a communist dictatorship and a country that is one: you’re at that workplace by your own consent and you can leave.

                Communism is okay when people can choose it willingly and opt out any time. When that communist system is competing with other communist systems for resources.

                Also, the means of production are largely owned by workers in the United States, given how many companies offer stock to their employees, and how many people work for themselves, and how many people use their own tools, cars, computers, and kitchens to earn money.