• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    06 months ago

    I don’t think the license does anything at all, but it is weird to me that you are not also including some unique phrase or UUID. How are you going to prove their models used specifically your copyrighted content in the event that courts rule it is not fair use to do so? If you had a unique phrase you could probably trigger the model into repeating it as evidence.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        06 months ago

        You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially. You have completely different motivations. One major difference between you and ProPublica is they must have interacted with some actual lawyers explaining how copyright works.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          06 months ago

          You are writing “anti-commercial AI,” they are making their work explicitly available to republish non-commercially.

          That’s just a description of what the license actually does, non-commercial usage of my content.

          It’s actually not even my description, it’s one I got from someone else, who’s also licensing their content with the same license.

          I have no problem with my content being used for non-commercial purposes.

          You have completely different motivations.

          No, I do not. My intent aligns with ProPublica.

          Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            06 months ago

            “Your license doesn’t do what you say it does.”

            “Haha, joke’s on you, I don’t want it to do what I say it does.”

            Glad we figured that one out.