• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I am actually in full agreement.

    A header would put the setting on the device and only indicate “Minor” or “Not Minor” which would allow to restrict or allow porn without having to collect everyone’s PII just so they can crank their hog.

    If you read previous things though such an indicator would put a lot more responsibility onto Social Media platforms to not show harmful content to minors. Today they get away with it because “TOS says only 18 year olds are allowed to us this service”

    South Park kind of nailed the attitude https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Park_(Not_Suitable_for_Children)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But how would that header be verified?

      It has to be verified at some point by someone.

      That header could also easy be used to exploit children online. All I would need to do is a simple intercept to log headers.

      Either trust parents to do their jobs fully, and then hold them accountable, or draw a line at which point a child can be reasonably held responsible.

      If a 6 year old steals, it’s the 6 year olds fault. They’re tried differently, but they still know bette, this isn’t any different. But obviously a 6 year old should not be accessing porn for a plethora of reasons.