• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    03 days ago

    Reaching escape velocity is expensive. We can be more efficient and still achieve the same result using a minuscule fraction of the propellant and none of the rocket framing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      03 days ago

      I mean we’re already sending rockets up there. I’m sure we can afford to dump him out on the way.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            02 days ago

            Just hogtie him and leave him on the lauch pad. We get rid of a problem, and the problem is turned into mostly it’s component atoms. Give giving the circle of life a little help!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            03 days ago

            To be clear, I am not advocating for shooting Musk. I am saying we can ignite a fraction of the rocket fuel without any of the containment vessels or expensive infrastructure. While there will be no liftoff, it would certainly be uplifting.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Trebuchet? Cheap? ✅. Easily assembled and transported? ✅. Low tech not needed any rare earth materials? ✅. Sufficient to launch him at least 150 m? ✅. Low survivability rate for potential additional yeeting? ✅.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              02 days ago

              Hmm, I think we shouldn’t rule out other simple machines with wooden frames and French names just yet.