A project called “Remove-DEI” shows the tweaks used to remove “forbidden words” from a database about childhood school readiness.

The updates, shown in Github commits, are to a database for the Department of Health and Human Services’ Head Start program. They show a project called “Remove-DEI,” which reveal some of the back-and-forth that is happening behind the scenes to align federal agencies with Donald Trump’s executive orders that forbid almost anything having to do with race or gender within federal agencies. The Github pages show software engineers discussing amongst themselves how to best remove all instances of “forbidden words” from a specific database, and the code updates they used to do it. The changes also show that, while thousands of government datasets are disappearing from the internet, even ones that remain are having parts of their utility deprecated or broken in a way that may not be visible to those outside the government.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -6018 days ago

      Internals of state structures being mandated some terminology is not really a violation of free speech.

      In theory there are two approaches to discrimination - the neutral and the compensatory. The neutral one is that eventually discrimination will dissolve if the structure is built truly neutrally. The compensatory one is to detect kinds of discrimination and compensate for them specifically. I can imagine both the former and the latter feeling nicer in theory. The former - well, no special cases, just prevent the structure itself from reinforcing injustice. The latter - well, everything in life is a special case, you’ll never have a perfect structure, so it’s better to work with what you have.

      It’s like different kinds of interference in radio, requiring different solutions. In fact they are not contradictory and both have their place in a working system (I haven’t heard of such).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          317 days ago

          Yes, there’s no such thing. Just as there’s no such thing as perfect compensation.

          Also by neutral structure I mean what they are pretending to be making now, and by compensatory what’s supposed to have existed before. I hope that hasn’t eluded you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        717 days ago

        What the fuck did I just read? This sounds actually a lot like raw unapologetic hate of people that don’t fit [blank] from society. It’s utterly insane. It will hurt you eventually, you know that right?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -417 days ago

          I don’t think I’m taking side in that text.

          I do think you shouldn’t make opinions of text you didn’t understand.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            517 days ago

            You are taking side in that text. I fully understand it, it’s not as elegant and complex as you think. It’s just evil.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -417 days ago

              Well, impossible to argue with such a claim, but if you really want for it to be something worth your own time, you can explain what side, in your opinion, I’m taking, when saying that there are two approaches at making a state structure support equality (something almost every ideology, even fascist, in some sense wants, they differ in the core criterion before which people must be equal), and while Musk&Trump&rest are claiming to be transitioning from one to another, they have no intention to finish it, so they are just breaking things.

              Damn right it’s neither elegant nor complex, it’s actually so long because it’s clumsy.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 days ago

                Making a “state structure” that vilifies and exclude humans based on race, sexual orientation, thoughts etc. Is not valid. It’s not a state structure. It’s a tantrum. It’s rage and hate. It’s not a valid state organization because it’s not related to the things those concern, it’s focused on defeating pain from being inferior onto others and doesn’t belong

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15118 days ago

        This is being done by trump and musk.

        Microsoft just own the company where this is being discussed because the people actually doing the work are treating it like any other software project.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          117 days ago

          Apologists who sit down at the same table as the Nazis are equivocal to the pre-seated Nazis. Zero sympathy.

          Purge and lance the boil.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9418 days ago

            I think you’re missing something here.

            GitHub isn’t doing anything. It’s just a repository where people can track changes that are happening by end users. The end users are using GitHub and are removing DEI stuff from their products at the direction of the US government (AKA. Musk and Trump).

            Being angry at Microsoft is like being angry at a grocery store chain because you saw a kid being told by his grandpa to feed stale bread (from that grocery store) to some ducks.

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              -2918 days ago

              Maybe, I’ll reread, I’ve something to do shortly that will take most of my day but I’ll come back tonight to this. Thank you

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2218 days ago

                To add, GitHub is actually a great place to be making these changes, because with GitHub you retain history of the edits and prior versions. So after Trump changes his mind or loses power, the missing information can be brought back in fairly easily. Nothing is permanently lost.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1218 days ago

                    Most of these pages probably don’t change for years. And maybe not explicitly "revert"ing the change, but they’d know where to go back and find the text used for DEI stuff.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    617 days ago

                    Revert a 4 year old commit without dealing with conflict hell? I sure wish them luck

                    They should just revert every single change since this commit. That will role back all 4 years of Trump’s enshitification.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  718 days ago

                  So after Trump changes his mind or loses power, the missing information can be brought back in fairly easily. Nothing is permanently lost.

                  It’s funny they have absolutely no idea.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  118 days ago

                  Missing information being brought back? Assuming they don’t destroy backups. Assuming there are backups.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    418 days ago

                    It’d take extra effort to remove the Git diff history, and I don’t think higher ups would know or the lower downs would care, lol

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5018 days ago

            Excusing what? Someone called out the “free speech absolutist” hypocrisy. You assumed they were talking about Github or Microsoft for some reason. I corrected you.

            Maybe learn how to contribute to a conversation?

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              -7218 days ago

              And people discussing it are employed by musk?

              • TJA!
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2018 days ago

                The people that are discussing it are exposing it and showing what is happening. And the tools provided by GitHub are helping.

                So your original comment was celebrating Microsoft?

          • snooggums
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            Are you too stupid to understand the difference between hosting software source code and modifying it?

            Microsoft/github are not the ones making changes through commits.