• Scrubbles
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2628 days ago

    Can someone ELI5? He’s admitting it was never truly open? Or they were wrong for thinking open was good at all?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5328 days ago

      OpenAI was started to be as open as possible, and to prevent the kinds of capitalism-driven Closed-AI development that they have now themselves become.

      My personal opinion is that closed AI systems are only good if the owners are trustworthy. And in the long-run, no single owner can be trusted. There are risks with letting everyone copy and customize AI, however the worse danger is that the power gets too centralized with one single company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        OpenAI was started to be as open as possible, and to prevent the kinds of capitalism-driven Closed-AI development that they have now themselves become.

        No, that was what OpenAI said its goals originally were. They were lying. They always intended for it to become a capitalist venture. Anyone who listens to Tech Won’t Save Us or This Machine Kills or Team Human have known all along. Or anyone like me who’s been in the industry for thirty years.

    • zkfcfbzr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      328 days ago

      He’s saying they’re wrong for not currently being open.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        228 days ago

        No, he said they “need to figure out a different open source strategy”. That is completely different.