And they’re already kissing Trump’s ass

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    224 hours ago

    I didn’t bother following the court case, what were they arguing, freedom of the press?

    • Traister101
      link
      fedilink
      English
      522 hours ago

      The law boiled down says any applications from Rushia or China are inherently a security risk and therefore can be banned no questions asked (currently they have to go app by app) which to put it simply is extremely concerning. Straight up US great firewall type shit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Not all apps, review/travel sites get a pass, and the decision is left to the president, which is a dumb way to do it.


        DIVISION H-- PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT

        Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act

        (Sec. 2) This division prohibits distributing, maintaining, updating, or providing internet hosting services for a foreign adversary controlled application (e.g., TikTok). However, the prohibition does not apply to a covered application that executes a qualified divestiture as determined by the President.

        Under the division, a foreign adversary controlled application is an application directly or indirectly operated by (1) ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok, their subsidiaries, successors, related entities they control, or entities controlled by a foreign adversary country; or (2) a social media company that is controlled by a foreign adversary country and determined by the President to present a significant threat to national security. (Here, a social media company excludes any website or application primarily used to post product reviews, business reviews, or travel information and reviews.)