• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    145 days ago

    Then ban that shit too

    We shouldn’t allow corporations to psychology manipulate children.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Playing games is different than manipulating money out of minors.

        You know that too

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            115 days ago

            You could just sell the game at a flat cost. You know, like they use to and still do. If you want a “Live Service” game, just sell a DLC/Expansion Pack every few months.

              • Elevator7009
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Most people consider lootbox/gacha predatory and regular advertising a necessary evil. Regular advertising is often manipulative too, but most people consider lootbox/gacha to be more so, especially because of the addictive gambling mechanics it uses that regular advertising doesn’t. Also, most people are used to advertising, and putting lootboxes/gacha in video games is something I am assuming most Lemmy posters can remember there being a controversy over before microtransactions became The New Normal.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                55 days ago

                No. That would be taking money from the parents when they purchase the game. The kids would only be playing the game and so long as there’s no store front in the game, there’s no problem.

                Would you ban kids from riding bicycles because stores sell them?