• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestly, it might be a good thing long-run to have a higher percentage of users on VPNs. They aren’t a magic cure-all, but they do help make it safer to use untrusted networks and discourage some things on the service side, like geolocating and data-mining users based on IP.

    “This might address some security problems” is somewhat abstract to appeal to most users, I think. “VPN or no tits” is something that I think is more generally-relatable.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      I’m worried it will lead to bans of those though too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        252 months ago

        Not that they won’t try, but it’s very difficult to blanket ban VPNs. There are very legitimate business reasons to use them and it isn’t necessarily easy for ISPs to distinguish between a “recreational” VPN connection and an employee VPN’ing into say, a work datacenter. Industry will kick up a massive fuss about it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          162 months ago

          Hell, I VPN into my home network all the time to access my self hosted work applications, it’s 10x more secure than leaving ports open to the wider internet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        I think that it’s kind of globally-applicable.

        And I’ve wondered in the past whether the long-run for the Internet was always going to be people generally winding up with VPNs for similar reasons. I’m far from the first:

        The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

        John Gilmore