• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    318 days ago

    Yeah, I’m one of em. I’m well aware it’s not secure, but as a frontend, signal certainly was more customizable and pleasant to use even for just the few people I had to sms till I could convince to use signal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      37 days ago

      I agree that it helped with adoption. In a way I wish they still had it so I could get my text messaging family to use a messaging app instead.

      The flip side was, if somebody tried signal and didn’t like it and uninstalled it, then any SMS message to them from signal went to their signal account that they no longer had installed so they didn’t get it. You had no way of knowing so it really sucked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        17 days ago

        Ah yeah, I’d forgotten about that.

        I’m certain the engineering team considered it, but I wonder why they didn’t pursue having accounts that haven’t signed in for a while issue a notice to the sender, or even have the account deactivate itself.

        Make an opt-out default, you could disable that behaviour if your threat model needed to account for that 🤷

    • warm
      link
      fedilink
      238 days ago

      It was so much easier to convince people to use Signal when it had SMS support. I think while Signal needed to drop it, it wasn’t the time yet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        158 days ago

        I’m not convinced it ever should’ve. Make it obvious sms mode is in use, etc etc. But it was great to have everything in one place. One blocklist, great photo editing etc

        • warm
          link
          fedilink
          47 days ago

          Maybe. For me the worst change they made was removing custom colours for my contacts.