• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      607 hours ago

      It’s like reverse stack ranking. They’ll be left with the people that couldn’t find another job.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      166 hours ago

      Like many companies, they overhired in the last 4 years. Some of these people are due years of severance (my offer listed 2months for every year after 1 year), not to mention the vested stocks and other bonuses granted during this insane hot hire period.

      So how do you remove people not loyal to the company? The most hated mandate ever. Amazon is a company that doesn’t need people in the office. This is nothing more than screwing people over.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 hours ago

        No rank and file US-based employees at Amazon are getting years of severance. They don’t do that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14 hours ago

      If Amazon don’t think that remote work is productive, then they don’t think they’re losing anything. I don’t even know how “stealth” this is at all. They must believe that those individuals could be productive, because they are trying to keep them working in office. I’m not sure why anyone thinks a company like Amazon would try to be “stealth” about a layoff anyway. They don’t need to.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 hours ago

        You don’t have to fund severance if people leave on their own.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 hours ago

        I am pretty sure working from home has proven to be more productive, so I think other factors are at play here. I worry that returning to the office might be the only way to keep the capitalists from trying to send our jobs over to poorer nations. If the tapeworms think the job needs to be done face to face then it is much hardet to send those jobs to India or S. America.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 hours ago

        So they don’t have to pay severance or other state penalties for doing an actual layoff. They aren’t thinking of talent with this move.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      318 hours ago

      Yep this has been the modus operandi for businesses who want to reduce workforce without having to pay for layoffs.