NATO fighter jets were scrambled to intercept five Russian military aircraft flying over the Baltic Sea without flight plans or active transponders, the Latvian Air Force confirmed on Saturday.

The Russian planes were identified on two separate occasions, on Friday and Saturday, prompting a rapid response from NATO’s Baltic Air Policing mission.

According to the Latvian Air Force, the Russian jets were detected flying in international airspace near the Baltic states, but had not activated their transponders, an electronic system that helps maintain safe air traffic control.

“Russian jets regularly enter the airspace above the Baltics with transponders switched off, likely to test the response of NATO states,” The Kyiv Independent reported, citing past instances of similar activities by Russian aircraft.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      413 months ago

      Putin would be very angry and threaten to use nukes… so basically just another Tuesday.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          153 months ago

          For those who don’t get the joke. During the Cold War, China had a habit of issuing “final warnings” which didn’t have any teeth. Since the propaganda was regularly aired over the radio in Russia, Russians began joking about “oh this is china’s third final warning this week, I bet people are scared now” type of stuff.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 months ago

      There’s generally a procedure for that:

      1. Common frequency warning (ie. Guard frequency, 122.75)
      2. Close flyby to make the airplane change direction
      3. Shoot

      If you skip the first two steps, you messed up and should be disciplined.

      Ideally, the country that made the mistake should reach out to the other country to prevent escalation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        Sure you’re correct, but isn’t it, or shouldn’t it, also be:

        Do not try to fly in the airspace you are not supposed to fly in?

        I mean the Russians and before them the Soviets have done that deliberately since forever.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          122.75 is assigned for air-to-air communications.

          In some ways that’s good: you don’t want someone shouting about “YOU’RE ON GUARD”. On the other hand, in this situation you want to choose a frequency that your target is actually monitoring, and guard may fit that bill better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        “Mistake”

        You think 5 Russian jets mistakenly flew into US airspace? They do this shit all the time to many countries, there is zero mistake.

        Shoot the fuckers down and see how often they keep playing this dumbarse game.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          43 months ago

          They flew over international waters in the Baltic sea. almost as far away from the US as you can get. No need to get a war boner going.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 months ago

        I was thinking about that incident a lot lately.

        Putin is ultimately an alley bully. He’s weak and only pretends to be powerful, hoping no one calls his bluff.

        Turkey called his bluff. Putin was super aggressive, but Turkey just said, well, terrible tragedy, let’s hope that never happens again, right Vlad?

        Well and it never happened again. Turkey is a NATO member. A NATO country shot down a Russian jet and nothing happened.

        Cowards like Putin can’t be convinced or tamed, they only respond to strength. And currently, NATO doesn’t exactly seem strong.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 months ago

        That’s a different scenario. That was over Syrian/Turkish airspace and Russia likely knew they don’t have a leg to stand on there considering the close vicinity of the border and conflicting reports over the bomber’s flight path. Not to mention that Turkey is a lot closer to Russia than the average NATO state.

        I don’t think it could escalate to a full war, but shooting down aircraft in intl. airspace is much more serious than a bomber that has strayed into your national airspace.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23 months ago

      Yeah shooting down an aircraft over international waters would probably be a major incident actually.