• moxOP
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    That’s fair. I think the last word in the URL does a good job of representing the implementation’s claimed level of maturity:

    draft

    :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      03 months ago

      You said

      This proposal is a new iteration of the language and standard library. It would provide safe language features for preventing such problems existing in the first place.

      Either it’s a draft or it’s a new iteration of the language. Can’t be both.

      • moxOP
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        Either it’s a draft or it’s a new iteration of the language. Can’t be both.

        It’s a draft of a proposal for a new iteration. Is that so difficult for you to understand?

          • moxOP
            link
            fedilink
            03 months ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Draft

            I think it’s pretty clear that IETF drafts are not what author meant when he wrote draft, and I’m pretty sure the IETF doesn’t have much to do with C++ standards.

            Are you under the impression that there is no other sense of the word?

            It might help you in the future when you are discussing things like drafts, specifications, and proposals.

            As it turns out, I have done more than a little of that. Thankfully, I don’t usually see such condescending remarks in the process, nor such insistence on misunderstanding. Good luck to you, too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            03 months ago

            He never said it was an Internet Draft. Try actually reading. It might help you in the future when you are discussing things.