• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          I think they meant what the end user would NORMALLY pay, which is the better comparison.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            64 months ago

            But Apple isn’t buying consumer ram, they’re spending $8 to put on a different chip instead. If other laptop manufacturers are charging $50, it’s because they think they can get away with it, like apple.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  04 months ago

                  It’s really not. Other companies with socketed RAM also upsell, they are just limited in how much they can ask because the customer has the option to DIY adding more RAM. So the cost these companies charge is roughly the price to the customer of upgrading their own RAM, plus a bit extra for the convenience of not having to do that.

                  For example, Framework upcharges by something like 20-50% for RAM and SSDs when comparing to equivalent parts. It’s not just Apple, all OEMs do it, but Apple can charge much more because the user can’t easily replace either on their own.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    14 months ago

                    Since everyone is doing it, we should not call it out and just accept those insane margins…

    • azuth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      I remember an Apple fanboy arguing that this made things better!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        It does make some things better, but there are a number of downsides too. The biggest downside is that it’s not practical to make the memory socketed because of the speed that’s required.