• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    643 months ago

    Either Google continually buys companies for far more than they should or they really suck at buisness. How many times have they aquired healthy companies then absolutely destroyed them? It’s hard for me to believe they’re not actively trying to at this point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      473 months ago

      The point is to exterminate them. To paraphrase another company, embrace, extend, extinguish.

      • RubberDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        In this case it’s more if you can’t beat em buy em. But it’s from the same school of business.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      193 months ago

      Yeah, if they are healthy companies they could snag some market share from one of Google’s products.

      Easier to kill them early.

    • TAG
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      I would assume some of that is acqui-hiring. Google acquires a company and looks at which employees are the outstanding talent. The best employees are poached for projects Google cares about while the rest are left to keep the product going without the thought leaders who built it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It means you get to dismantle a competitor, while also retaining the employees otherwise best suited to create a new competitor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      Between Fitbit and Nest, I don’t know how they can buy them and not just let them run separately like Waze. They have great brands that were ruined.