• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    285 months ago

    Yeah, that’s the point. What do guns have to do with encryption? I could say “If you outlaw beards, only outlaws will have beards” and it will make as much sense as your original post. I appreciate that you have a weird fetish for violence but you don’t have to shoe-horn it into every conversation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -145 months ago

      Privacy and guns can be used for defense. Beards generally don’t affect that (though Alexander was of a different opinion and made his soldiers shave so that they couldn’t be grabbed by the beard ; I think same was the reasoning for Roman soldiers shaving their beards and other hair).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        125 months ago

        You can’t murder a room full of children with pgp.

        I’ll just say it again in the hope that it might dawn on you that the two things are not even remotely similar enough that you can say “this also works for guns”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -95 months ago

          I’ve already described specifically how they are similar, it might dawn on you that repetition doesn’t strengthen an argument. Not hopeful though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            75 months ago

            What? That they can both be used for defense? Name something that couldn’t ever be used for defense. Your comparison is pointless because the only trait they share is one which is also shared by pretty much everything else on the planet. Like beards, to bring up an earlier example.