We all knew it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    195 months ago

    I witnessed a huge number of failed projects in my 25-year career. The cause was almost always the same: inexperienced developers trying to create a reusable product that could be applied to imagined future scenarios, leading to a vastly overcomplicated mess that couldn’t even satisfy the needs of the original client. Made no difference what the language or framework was or what development methodology was utilized.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      65 months ago

      I feel like that’s the same underlying issue: The requirements are not understood upfront.

      If a customer cannot give you any specific information, you cannot cut any corners. You’re pretty much forced to build a general framework, so that as the requirements become clearer, you’re still equipped to handle them.

      I guess, the alternative is building a prototype, which you’re allowed to throw away afterwards. I’ve never been able to do that, because our management does not understand that concept.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 months ago

        I feel like that’s the same underlying issue: The requirements are not understood upfront.

        Actually on most of these failed projects the requirements of the original customer were pretty clear. But the developers tried to go far beyond those original requirements. It is fair to say that the future requirements were not well understood.

        the alternative is building a prototype, which you’re allowed to throw away afterwards

        Lol I’ve done many prototypes. The problem is that management sees them and says “oh, so we’re finished with the project already? Yay!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 months ago

      I’ve seen a lot of contractors over promising timelines too. “No matter how hard you push and no matter what the priority, you can’t increase the speed of light.”

      But yeah exactly.