• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    05 months ago

    On all the agile projects I’ve worked on, the teams have been very reluctant to make a specification in place before starting development. Often claiming that we can’t know the requirements up-front, because we’re agile.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      05 months ago

      For your sake, I hope your employment was agile as well. Those jobs sound like they were dumpster fires waiting to happen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Also seems like a shitty get-outta-jail-free card. With no design in place, timelines and acceptance criteria can’t be enforced. “Of course we’re done now, we just decided that we’re done!”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      05 months ago

      On all the agile projects I’ve worked on, the teams have been very reluctant to make a specification in place before starting development.

      I don’t think this is an Agile thing, at all. I mean, look at what Agile’s main trait: multiple iterations with acceptance testing and product&design reviews. At each iteration there is planning. At each planning session you review/create tickets tracking goals and tasks. This makes it abundantly clear that Agile is based in your ability to plan for the long term but break/adapt progress into multiple short-term plans.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      05 months ago

      How did they know how to break things down into tasks? How did they know if a task would fit in a sprint? 😄

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        05 months ago

        We’re so agile the sprint became a time-block framework rather than a lock-down of tickets that we certainly will finish. (In part because stuff comes up within sprint.)