• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 hours ago

    “The lawsuit isn’t the only place where executives have offered a pessimistic assessment of X’s business. The company’s owner Elon Musk reportedly told employees in January that “user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and we’re barely breaking even.””

    • ArchRecord
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 hours ago

      It’s not a boycott, neither is it illegal. He’s literally just being a crybaby and believes that anybody not pandering to his business model should be forced by the courts to give him money regardless.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    148 hours ago

    YouTube 10 years ago: we’re becoming as straight-edged as possible to keep advertisers around

    Twitter now: Fuck you (wait we needed you)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3711 hours ago

    If suing companies for not advertising on your platform made any sense, porn sites could sue almost the whole economy.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2813 hours ago

    Oh yes Nestle, the infamously lefty liberals.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5414 hours ago

    Last year he told everybody to go fuck themselves. Now he’s crying. If there is somebody who needs to be deported, is it his narcistic, selfish, apartheid’s ass.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      86 hours ago

      The legal system is essentially purchased at this point (remember everyone gloating about how the Onion bought InfoWars?)

      There’s a chance he might find a toadie judge and get something out of this. Or at least be obnoxious enough that others might preemptively comply with something.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 hours ago

      Laws introduced to prevent people from boycotting israeli companies allow Musk to sueanyone who won’t advertise on X for political reasons.

      And no, the first amendment doesn’t protect speech for private companies.

      He’ll win.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1414 hours ago

      I mean he’s being bukaked with publicity… So if that’s his thing?

      What I’d like to know, assuming there is still logic and sanity in this world (please it’s all I have don’t argue) how would a company from this list have avoided this in the first place? Like once you start advertising with a partner like X then you may never stop? Seriously I’m not sure. So maybe just never risk doing business with anyone because you’ll be sued into staying in business with them forever? I’m certain it’s right in their contracts how and when they can leave, is that in dispute?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          612 hours ago

          Yes it absolutely did, but the platform was not run responsibly, and contained hate speech. Musk even claimed the Nazi content besides adverts was a rare fluke.
          Which is obvious today is not true. What Musk may really want, is to normalize Nazi content.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1114 hours ago

      “I’m in a government that condones - if not encourages - businesses from rejecting customers based on their own ideology, but don’t do it to me!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1113 hours ago

    What about capital markets and the freedom to choose where to spend your money? Elmo can go get pegged by Trump.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1815 hours ago

    i wounder if he will actually get a court to order that every person in the world owes him money.

    cause that seems to be what he is working towards.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      No, the case is that advertisers used an Ad Advisory Group called GARM, that monitored advertising platforms on their quality, like being family friendly and keeping things within the law. When they advised their customers that they could no longer vouch for X, many advertisers followed their guidance.

      Obviously they are in their right to do so, and there was absolutely nothing wrong with the procedures that were followed, like it was NOT cartel or any other kind of shenanigans by the users of that service.

      https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/ad-advisory-group-suspends-activity-following-legal-action-from-x/723785/

      But Musk being a paranoid malignant narcissistic crybaby, saw it as a conspiracy directed against him personally. And the guy has more money than sense, so he is making a huge issue out of it.

      Luckily USA is a nation of law, so he won’t get anywhere with that, just like he wouldn’t get away with calling people pedophiles for no other reason than to offend them. Thank god USA isn’t corrupt as hell, so we can trust the courts to do the right thing. /s

      On the other hand we also have EU warning against advertising on X:
      https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/11/17/eu-commission-advises-services-to-stop-advertising-on-elon-musks-x