- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion
- technology
- cross-posted to:
- nottheonion
- technology
Summary
Meta’s Instagram faced criticism after searches for “Democrat” or “Democrats” displayed a “results hidden” message, while “Republican” returned 3.3 million posts.
The issue emerged after Donald Trump’s inauguration, which Meta owner Mark Zuckerberg attended.
Meta attributed the problem to a technical error affecting political hashtags and promised a quick fix.
Critics, however, flagged concerns over perceived political bias, especially as Meta has recently shifted content moderation policies and aligned closer to the Republican administration, including donations to Trump and appointing a Republican as global affairs chief.
You must log in or register to comment.
Ah yes, the censoring.
Ditch all meta ‘products’
Just travelled through Chile. All bus schedules in the south are exclusively on Facebook and Instagram, and literally the only way to book a ticket is Whatsapp.
I wish I was exaggerating.Just need the rest of the world to ditch WhatsApp and that will be the last meta app that I use
I simply refuse to use it. Need to message me on WhatsApp? Here’s my email.
You can link up your email to whatsapp?
No, but more people have email than WhatsApp.
I currently work for a company that does contractual support for some meta products. I’ll be doing my part to slow work there until I move
Haven’t logged into my facebook since covid. Don’t have Instagram, WhatsApp or other social media crap. Lemmy (sometimes reddit, I have to admit) and Discord are the only “social networks” (I hate this term, it should be para-social network) I use.
And block or (better) poison all their trackers. Just because you’re not using a Meta product doesn’t mean they’re not spying on you.
Any tips on how to do this?
Remember when the Facebook Graph API first launched and people used it to find all the gay people in their city?
This is why privacy matters.
Meanwhile in another thread, I am attempting to explain to someone who wants Signal to be able to directly interface with WhatsApp, someone who has no understanding of why metadata security is a big deal… why purely on technical, privacy / security level, that’s not workable.
Well, here’s another arrow in my quiver if that discussion continues, jesus fucking christ.
Isn’t that legally required in the EU?
Tip of the iceberg. Even if this was a mistake, we don’t know what any engines are hiding if they don’t display results.
The mistake was that they got caught. Going forward they will be sure to shadow ban any content the orange turd doesn’t want.
“Back to our roots around free expression”
I just got rid of Instagram fuck you Zuckerberg
Threatening billionaires with jail apparently works. I wonder if it could be used to make them pay taxes.
The current administration:
Didn’t work with trump
Let’s be real, he was never really threatened with jail time.
Wouldn’t it be funny if a country inserted its agents into the US tech job market to gain access to code in order to manipulate the public with little tweaks to algorithms?
I read this as “fascists are querying Instagram to build a list of people to attack, so Meta is defending these people by blocking such queries”
I don’t read it like that
Oh God, have we come full circle? 8 years ago this would be the same article but about how meta was blocking conservatives…
But they never did lol. They literally amplified them.
It would be conservatives lying about being blocked.
The Supreme Court confirmed government censorship happened but didn’t say it was unconstitutional. Now it seems the shoe is on the other foot, either because Trump wants it or Mark Zuckerberg wants to suck up to him.
I’m not seeing where in that article it says the Supreme Court confirmed that conservatives were being blocked by social media, let alone that social media was being forced to by the government. Can you clip me the excerpt i’m missing?
The dispute was primarily over standing.
The lawsuit centers on “jawboning,” a term used to describe informal efforts by government officials to persuade someone outside the government to take action. In this case, the plaintiffs – two states with Republican attorneys general and several individuals whose social media posts were removed or downgraded – challenged the Biden administration’s efforts in 2021 to restrict misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine. They argued that the administration’s actions had violated social media users’ rights to free speech.
Amy Coney Barrett claims the censorship happened before any communication with the White House or the CDC…
Barrett acknowledged, “Facebook was targeting her pages before almost all of its communications with the White House and the CDC, which weakens the inference that her subsequent restrictions are likely traceable to ‘government-coerced enforcement’ of Facebook’s policies.”
But as Samuel Alito notes…
“[f]or months in 2021 and 2022, a coterie of officials at the highest levels of the Federal Government continuously harried and implicitly threatened Facebook with potentially crippling consequences if it did not comply with their wishes about the suppression of certain COVID-19-related speech. Not surprisingly,” Alito concluded, “Facebook repeatedly yielded.”
While standing was denied, and the censorship may have happened before the White House requested it, it’s clear the admin wanted this to happen. Otherwise the communications over this stuff wouldn’t have taken place.
Your quotes are talking about blocking misinformation about COVID.
None of them are referring to blocking Conservatives.
I mean, technically you’re not wrong. But the Venn diagram is nearly a circle.
Who the fuck cares what those pieces of traitor filth say?
That was not about government censorship. That was about the government being able to discuss with corporations what harmful things should be self-filtered by the corporations.
Also, since those things the government in that lawsuit wanted filtered were false and harmful misinformation related to election security and COVID, it seems conservatives equate harmful and fake shit as “conservative.”
Can’t say the n word?!?? Republican viewpoints are being SiLeNcEd!!!
🙄
You mean the company that hired Cambridge Analytics to help Trump win the first time was censoring conservative sources? I don’t think so.
Why do people seem to think I’m saying that Meta was blocking conservatives? Are Lemmykins that bad at comprehension or are they too just egged along by the rage machine to the point where they can’t think clearly?
about how meta was blocking conservatives
Because those are the literal words you used?
8 years ago this would be the same article but about how meta was blocking conservatives
So comprehension then. Thanks!
IDK dog if this many people misunderstood my point I’d be trying better not doubling down on blaming them but you do you
I’m happy to accept that there are a lot of stupid people on Lemmy, particularly the politics communities.
Why do people seem to think I’m saying that Meta was blocking conservatives?
Because your literal words were “the same article but about how meta was blocking conservatives.” Please tell the class how saying “meta was blocking conservatives” does NOT mean “Meta was blocking conservatives.”
I used other words around those ones too. So comprehension is the issue. Thanks!
