• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      It was released along side mods (a very slow first party mod manager) so I guess they think it makes it better. The mods are good and it’s a nice thing that they don’t depend on the steam workshop anymore but they don’t excuse releasing a £10 dlc along side it that just adds more skins for low density houses when the game still doesn’t work

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        03 months ago

        To be fair, adding skins is a lot easier than fixing performance issues, and probably involves different, non-overlapping teams

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          They also made some pretty significant improvements to performance, and importantly, simulation speed with this one. But yeah, the DLC is kind of insulting.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    Yeah the DLC is really scummy imo. Definitely not worth the money. I’m just gonna ignore it. What’s more hopeful is the free patch with the introduction of mods and a good amount of bugfixes. If they keep this going they might be able to pull a Cyberpunk (although slightly less dramatic).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Yeah, if they can get performance better and bugs fixed, I’ll get it. But not until then.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Watching gamers back peddle on cyberpunk hurts my soul. Just because the game is good now doesn’t excuse the bullshit they pulled on launch but peope just excuse it because it’s good now, they get what they deserve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        What exactly do you want done about it? Are people not allowed to like a game if they had a bad launch but have since fixed it up?

        Ultimately, the stakes are pretty low and you can avoid the risk of bad launches by just avoiding new launches in general and see where things stand with the game once the dust settles.

        Personally, I’d take a bad launch year over MTX or invasive DRM/anti-cheat methods that don’t even really work to stop piracy or cheating.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        I get what you say, but I bought Cyberpunk after the fixes and it’s legitimately one of my favourite games I’ve ever played. They should’ve never been in this position, but they righted their wrongs instead of abandoning the game and they made it into the masterpiece it deserved to be.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    I’ll just go play the first Cities Skylines. I didn’t have many complaints with that one and still love it.

    Except for traffic. That shit is a nightmare.

  • pgetsos
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    This game was one of the very few I was waiting so badly to come out, and was so so disappointed with the launch. Still hasn’t convinced me to try it, although it has come a long way

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    For all saying the content pack is scummy, first the devs that work on things like this are not the same fixing bugs and issues, working on mod tools etc. Second, this pack is part of the Ultimate Edition, which plenty of people paid for already. It’d be really scummy to NOT release this in a timely fashion for the people who already spent their money expecting it.

    I honestly don’t get the outrage at a freaking content pack that doesn’t affect anything at all…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      I mean, there’s obviously the stupid outrage of the “Why did they do this instead of fixing bugs?” variety (as if 3D artists can be reassigned to coding), but there’s also, I think, an absolutely justifiable resentment at being asked to pay $10 for an absolutely tiny handful of assets. Like, apparently this is something like ten buildings and four trees? That’s fucking weak. At around $3-$5 I think people would be fine with it, but $10 is just taking the piss.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        I completely agree, the price is pretty ridiculous and almost no one seems to be focusing on that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      If the game has as many bugs as people say, then the devs working on this should instead be supporting on fixing issues. Reallocate your resources. Obviously they dont have the same skillsets but lets not pretend that nothing could have been done differently

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        The people who work on asset packs are artists… what the hell can they do regarding bug fixes?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 months ago

          Sure they make the artwork, but who integrates it? What if bugs occur from that? If content packs could be made by artists alone, everyone would be pumping out content packs constantly.

        • Dark Arc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Gamers don’t understand software development and it shows

          (You’re absolutely right)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        Ah yes, just take a 3D modeller and reassign them to bug fixing. That’ll work out great. While we’re at it, your mechanic should start handling lung transplants since we’re short on doctors.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      I understand the energy in these replies, but do you guys seriously think artists are packaging their work as a DLC and integrating it into the main game? There is still a lot of work that goes into any DLC or major integration that has to be done by the same people that fix bugs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    03 months ago

    I have Skylines 2 installed on Gamepass for PC and it updated the other day… 54 gigs.

    Damn thing basically just re-downloaded itself.